Delhi High Court Takes Note of AI and Deepfake Concerns, Urges Government to Develop Comprehensive Regulations for Copyright Protection and Privacy Safeguards

Keywords: Delhi High Court, AI Copyright Infringement, Deepfake Technology, Privacy Violations, Public Interest Litigation, Copyright Act, Information Technology Rules, Women’s Privacy, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Art, Regulatory Measures, Personality Rights

Delhi High Court Examines AI’s Role in Copyright Infringement and Privacy Violations, Calls for Regulatory Measures

The Delhi High Court recently addressed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) highlighting the unauthorised use of original artistic works by Artificial Intelligence (AI) software. This case raises pressing concerns about copyright infringement, privacy violations, and the misuse of deepfake technology, especially in the context of personal and creative rights.

The PIL was filed by Kanchan Nagar, a professional model, Vikas Saboo, a photographer, and a company managing the stock photography website ‘Images Bazaar’. The petitioners brought attention to the increasing misuse of their original works by AI platforms, including unauthorized reproduction and manipulation of images, often without consent. The petitioners argue that this practice not only infringes on copyrights but also violates personality rights and privacy, particularly affecting women whose images are exploited inappropriately.

AI’s Unauthorised Use of Artistic Works: A Growing Concern

The petitioners pointed out that the use of AI for generating images often leads to deepfake technology exploitation, where individuals’ likenesses are replicated and altered without consent, causing significant harm, especially for women models. AI platforms, which can manipulate and generate realistic images, have raised alarms about privacy violations and the misuse of digital identities. This trend has sparked concerns about the ethical implications and the legal void in regulating such technologies.

In the PIL, the petitioners emphasized the unauthorised use of women’s images in AI-generated content, leading to privacy violations and the exploitation of their personal data. The petition seeks amendments to the Copyright Act of 1957 and the Information Technology Rules to address issues like cheating by impersonation and to regulate AI-based image generation. Furthermore, the petitioners have asked for measures to block unregulated applications that enable such image creation and sale, without the artist’s or model’s consent.

The Court’s Observations and Directions

The Court noted the increasing misuse of AI and deepfake technology to manipulate images, particularly concerning the exploitation of women without their consent. The Bench emphasized the importance of a balanced regulatory framework to protect individuals’ copyrights and privacy while fostering innovation in digital technologies.

The Court also acknowledged a prior directive in which the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology had constituted a committee to explore issues surrounding deepfakes and related concerns. The Bench urged the committee to engage with all relevant stakeholders, including internet intermediaries, telecom service providers, victims of deepfake misuse, and platforms enabling such technologies. The Chief Justice, Manmohan, underscored the complexity of the issue, remarking that although the court did not have a “magic wand” to solve the problem, it had directed the committee to take comprehensive action.

Privacy Implications and the Need for Clearer Regulations

During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners highlighted the privacy implications of AI-generated content, particularly regarding women’s images. They emphasized that such unauthorized uses often go beyond physical boundaries and disproportionately impact women. The counsel stressed the need for clear legal provisions to serve as a deterrent and ensure accountability, especially in the commercial sphere where images are often used for profit without the consent of the individuals involved.

The petitioners argued that not all individuals, especially women, have the resources or courage to approach the courts, making it essential to have preventive mechanisms in place. They also suggested that, at the very least, women’s faces should not be used commercially without their explicit consent.

Looking Ahead: Balancing Innovation and Protection

The Court’s observations underline a significant challenge in the digital age — balancing the benefits of AI technology and its potential for innovation with the need to safeguard copyrights, privacy, and personal rights. With AI-generated content becoming more prevalent and increasingly difficult to regulate, the Delhi High Court’s direction to consult relevant stakeholders and develop comprehensive regulations is a critical step in ensuring that artistic works and personal identities are protected in the evolving digital landscape.

As the case progresses, the government and regulatory bodies must carefully consider the ethical and legal implications of AI technologies and their intersection with intellectual property laws and privacy rights. Only through a holistic, collaborative effort can India ensure that AI-driven advancements are aligned with the values of justice, equity, and personal dignity.

Stay tuned for live updates on the rupee’s movement and real-time business news on Kanishk Social Media—your go-to source for comprehensive stock market and legal news.